Case studies
Social Movement Action Framework
Promoting healthy public policy through mobilized collective actions
Queen’s Park on the Road and Queen’s Park Day are two events in which RNAO members meet with members of provincial parliament (MPPs) from all of the political parties to promote healthy public policy and nursing services. through individual and collective actions. Learn more in this case study.
Through two annual initiatives – Queen’s Park on the Road and Queen’s Park Day – RNAO members meet with members of provincial parliament (MPPs) from all of the political parties to promote healthy public policy and nursing services. Through direct engagement and advocacy with MPPs, RNAO has mobilized collective action for policy initiatives addressing areas such as poverty reduction, the use of pesticides for cosmetic use, promoting refugee health and protecting the safety and security of residents in long-term care (Grinspun et al., 2018a).
Mobilizing community engagement to sustain a childhood obesity prevention initiative
Multiple communities mobilized to sustain a childhood obesity prevention program through targeted individual and collective action. Read more in this case study.
A community initiative called Sustainable Childhood Obesity Prevention through Community Engagement (SCOPE) provides an example of collective action in the context of public health.
In the SCOPE public health initiative, the community formed a coalition with local partners such as libraries and primary care offices to take collective action for the prevention of childhood obesity. Together, they participated in a range of collective action activities, including: presentations and events promoting healthy eating choices, stakeholder engagement, resource development and policy and practice change (Kennedy et al., 2019a).
Building a global collective identity to advance knowledge uptake and sustainability - the RNAO Best Practice Spotlight Organization (BPSO) Program
RNAO's Best Practice Spotlight Organization (BPSO) program has integrated a collective identity of knowledge champions to advance evidence uptake and sustainability.
The Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) Program (https://rnao.ca/bpg/bpso) has global reach and impact that is sustained by many factors, including the development of collective identity that promotes an evidence-based culture. The BPSO logo, as a tangible representation of a collective identity, is displayed in individual sites to indicate they are BPSO units. This visibility motivates and inspires nurses and other staff to use best practice guidelines (BPG) to support the health and well-being of staff, patients/persons and their families. Participation and membership in the international BPSO network further the ties and pride of BPSO and builds the collective identity (Grinspun & Bajnok, 2018).
Within organizations, individual BPSOs nurture Best Practice (BP) Champions (https://rnao.ca/bpg/get-involved/champions) who take on leadership roles to support the planning, implementation, evaluation and sustainability of BPGs. Nurses and other staff members develop a collective identity based on a culture of integrating evidence-based practice to achieve excellence in care. The visibility of BP Champions is seen when staff where BPSO-branded clothing items, and pins that are awarded at the completion of the Best Practice Champions’ training workshop (see the examples below of social media posts of BPSO-branded t-shirts and a pinning ceremony of new champions by RNAO CEO, Dr. Doris Grinspun) (Grinspun & Bajnok, 2018). |
Knowledge-to-Action Framework
Identifying the problem at Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute (FCI-IC) to achieve excellence in care
Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute is an acute care facility with a goal of achieving excellence in care in the prioritized areas of fall prevention and wound care.
Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute (FCI-IC) is a 340-bed hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Recognizing that the use of best practice guidelines (BPG) for nursing care was uncommon in Colombia, they joined RNAO’s Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) program with the goal of achieving excellence in care.
FCI-IC had 10 years of evaluation data that revealed problems in specific clinical areas such as fall prevention and wound care. They conducted a baseline diagnostic evaluation to identify the highest priority problems to tackle and to select the most appropriate guidelines and best practice recommendations. As part of this, they surveyed their key partners in the change to learn more about their use of assessment tools, the status of electronic medical records, routine clinical practices such as the use of bed rails, and prevalence data.
This assessment process led to them selecting three RNAO BPGs as knowledge tools: Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries in the Older Adult, Risk Assessment and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, and Assessment and Management of Foot Ulcers for People with Diabetes.
Conducting gap analyses to successfully implement new clinical practices at Tilbury Manor
Tilbury Manor, a long-term care home, chose to focus on provincially-mandated “required programs” when seeking to improve resident care using a gap analysis.
Tilbury Manor, a 75-resident long-term care home in Tilbury chose to focus on provincially-mandated “required programs” (fall prevention, skin and wound care, continence care, bowel management and pain management) when seeking to improve resident care.
They conducted a gap analysis to compare their current practices with the best practices outlined in related RNAO best practice guidelines. Their analysis included an assessment of clinical practices, policies and documentation systems. The results of the gap analysis helped them create specific action plans.
Tilbury Manor then formed project teams led by nurses and supported by a team of champions. These teams proceeded to educate staff, implement new clinical practices, conduct care reviews and conduct audits.
Multiple positive outcomes were reported as a result of implementing these best practices including reductions in reports of pain, less use of restraints, and less falls, pressure ulcers and urinary tract infections.
Adapting the Person- and Family-Centred Care best practice guideline to local context at Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre
Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Sioux Lookout, a town in Northwestern Ontario. The service area is remote, isolated and encompasses 385,000 square kilometres, with a population that is 85 per cent First Nations. Learn more how this site adapted guidelines to their local context in this case study.
Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Sioux Lookout, a town in Northwestern Ontario. SLMHC is a hub for inpatient and outpatient hospital services, providing services to including Sioux Lookout and 28 northern communities. The service area is remote, isolated and encompasses 385,000 square kilometres, with a population that is 85 per cent First Nations.
As part of its pre-designation process, the SLMHC change team implemented the Person- and Family- Centred Care (PFCC) best practice guideline (BPG). During implementation, the SLMHC change team worked to adapt the PFCC BPG to the local context of their organization in order to best serve the needs of the population in the surrounding areas as well as in other remote communities.
The SLMCH local context posed unique challenges. Among these:
- Standard guidance on privacy did not always apply to members of the First Nations communities served. Some members wished to have their health information shared with their chief and community.
- Some people must travel as far as 400 or 500 kilometers to return home after discharge from SLMHC. Thus, it was essential to arrange appropriate care transitions and make sure people being discharged would not lose personal belongings.
The SLMHC change team adapted the PFCC BPG to the local context by:
SLMHC Patient Oriented Discharge Summary. Shared with permission.
- placing names on the doors of the hospital rooms of some individuals, so their community members could stop by and visit.
- creating a Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) that included the following options to indicate the person’s preferences regarding sharing their health information:
- I agree to my health information being shared with________
- I do not agree with my health information being disclosed to people in my community (for example, band or council)
- creating a detailed staff checklist within the PODS to ensure safe care transitions (by, for example, faxing the completed form to an external Indigenous Transition Navigator, or listing personal items collected from the room).
- working with an Indigenous Transitions Facilitator, whose roles include conducting follow-up phone calls with the person, patient rounding, and coordinating safe transitions.
After successfully creating a tailored PODS that meets the need of the population they serve, SLMHC has been able to better support person- and family-centred care principles within the organization.
Shared with permission by Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre
Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences
Integrating patient partners in change – Lessons learned from Kidney Health Australia
Kidnney Health Australia case study
In early 2018, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) developed a guideline for managing percutaneous renal biopsies for individuals with chronic kidney disease (Scholes-Robertson et al., 2019). KHA included 40 persons from across Australia with lived experience of chronic kidney disease and their caregivers – “patient partners”. KHA asked patient partners to prioritize which topics were most important to them during a percutaneous renal biopsy.
Patient partners valued: minimizing discomfort and disruption, protecting their kidneys, enabling self-management, and making sure that support for families and caregivers would be available. They indicated that all of this would help alleviate anxiety and avoid undue stress. Their voices were heard, and KHA effectively incorporated these suggestions in guideline development.
Notably, there were marked differences between the priorities identified by the content experts on the guideline development working group, versus what the patient partners perceived to be important to their health and wellbeing, as shown in the table below.
Topics prioritized by content experts |
Topics prioritized by patient partners |
|
|