Case studies

Social Movement Action Framework

Social Movement Action Framework, Key characteristics Public visibility Making change happen

Using images and messages for a patient safety campaign

The Canadian Patient Safety Institute’s #ConquerSilence campaign uses images and powerful messaging to frame patient safety issues.  Read more in this case study. 

The Canadian Patient Safety Institute’s #ConquerSilence campaign uses images and powerful messaging to frame patient safety issues. The campaign includes webinars, podcasts, social media content and a communications toolkit. 

Canadian Patient Safety Institute
CPSI framing
Social Movement Action Framework, Emerging leadership Making change happen

Championing BPG implementation at Clinica las Condes

at Clínica las Condes (CLC), a Latin American Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Santiago, Chile, BP Champions are committed volunteers consisting mostly of nurses and other health professionals. Their leadership is evident in the multiple activities . Learn more in this case study. 

The Best Practice Guideline (BPG) Program has supported the leadership and influence of thousands of Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) Best Practice (BP) Champions as change agents engaged in the implementation of evidence-based practice changes.

For example, at Clínica las Condes (CLC), a Latin American Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Santiago, Chile, BP Champions are committed volunteers consisting mostly of nurses and other health professionals. Their leadership is evident in the multiple activities they lead, including:

  • reviewing guidelines and organizational policies
  • motivating colleagues
  • presenting guideline recommendations at clinical services meetings twice a year
  • ensuring adherence to practice changes in their clinical units

(Serna Restrepo et al., 2018)  

Clinica las Condes
Clinica Las Condes
Social Movement Action Framework, Emerging leadership Making change happen

Leveraging transformational leadership to engage teams and enhance person- and family-centred care at Hamilton Haldimand Brant (HNHB) Behavioural Supports Ontario (BSO)

Behavioural Supports Ontario (BSO) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) serving long-term care (LTC) homes in Hamilton, Haldimand-Norfolk, Brantford, Burlington and Niagara Regions.  Learn more about how they leveraged leadership to engage teams in person- and family-centred care in this case study. 

Behavioural Supports Ontario (BSO) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) serving long-term care (LTC) homes in Hamilton, Haldimand-Norfolk, Brantford, Burlington and Niagara Regions. BSO aims to enhance care and services for older adults with dementia, complex neurological conditions and mental health challenges who present with responsive behaviours through comprehensive assessment and the development of strategies to optimize care for the resident. 

The Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant (HNHB) BSO team supports 86 LTC homes with more than 11,200 beds combined. Using transformational leadership and applying key characteristics from the Social Movement Action (SMA) Framework, the organization successfully shifted the culture of the organization to one that supports and sustains high quality and best practices by engaging and motivating staff.  Integral to the process was a strong core leadership team of interprofessional staff, intrinsic motivation and momentum.

The organization used RNAO’s BPSO model and gap (opportunity) analysis tools to identify and evaluate areas of improvement in process and practice in three fields of work during the implementation of three RNAO best practice guidelines (BPG) – Person and Family Centered Care, Identification and Assessment of Pain and the Management of Delirium, Dementia and Depression. The impact on personalized care and satisfaction with care are described in Figures 1 and 2.  

Figure 1: Percentage of residents and families participating in developing their personalized plan of care (assessments completed during referrals) 

Evaluation impact: There was a 50.3 per cent increase in residents’ and families’ participation in developing personalized care plans.  Data remained consistently above the HNHB average since January 2021.

Figure 2: Number of residents and families satisfied with their involvement in care and treatment planning

Evaluation impact: There was an 80 per cent increase in residents’ and families’ satisfaction with their involvement in the care and treatment plan at the five implementation sites. Survey results from the five implementation sites demonstrated that residents and families responded “always” and “usually” when asked if they were satisfied with their involvement in the care and treatment planning.

In addition to these outcomes, HNHB BSO has identified the following improvements via quantitative data: 

  • increased number of screenings and assessments for pain completed
  • improved consistency in the screening and assessments of delirium, dementia and depression for all clients
  • improvement of more than 80 per cent in the number of residents and families satisfied with their involvement in care and treatment planning

Lessons learned

While implementing the BPGs, HNHB BSO discovered several effective strategies, including the following: 

  • Engaging staff to agree on a common resident-centered goal by developing a “BSO High Five” program. This program recognizes front-line workers who have demonstrated a person-and family-centered approach to care and have motivated other staff to implement and sustain best practices.
  • Applying transformational leadership that focused on staff and stakeholder involvement and engaging them throughout the assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation phases of BPG implementation.
  • Developing a best practice steering committee that includes formal and informal leaders, staff, and stakeholders. Persons with lived experience are also engaged in the committee to ensure the incorporation of a global perspective into the planning process from the start.
  • Ensuring best practices are on all meeting agendas to sustain momentum toward BPG implementation.
  • Conducting process and education gap analyses to address areas of improvement as part of a quality improvement project. 
  • Valuing staff-driven changes and improving synchronization between the project managers and the team to ensure cohesion, a common identity and a shared vision.
  • Understanding the importance of going slow and growing the changes to ensure the alignment amongst all staff. This was crucial to the planning and evaluation phases and allowed for the realignment of strategies and approaches, if necessary, during the implementation of projects. 

Shared with permission from Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant (HNHB) Behavioural Supports Ontario (BSO)

 

HNHB BSO
HNHB

Knowledge-to-Action Framework

Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Assess barriers/facilitators to knowledge use

Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice – Lessons learned from DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing

DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. Staff at the sites identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice.   

DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. They identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice. The assessment and identification of barriers allowed change teams to develop effective strategies for implementation with the input of stakeholders.

For example, for the implementation of the RNAO best practice guideline Assessment and management of foot ulcers for people with diabetes, barriers included

  • nursing shortages across China,
  • a lack of training to support the development of knowledge and skills in evidence-based nursing practice,
  • the costs of guideline implementation. and
  • practice recommendations that exceeded local nursing scope.

SOURCE: Transforming Nursing Through Knowledge, 2018.

Beijing, China
Beijing School of Nursing
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Evaluate outcomes Sustaining change

Evaluating the impact of implementing the Person- and Family-Centred Care Best Practice Guideline at Spectrum Health Care

Spectrum Health Care, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) and home health organization, evaluated care outcomes after implementing the Person- and Family-Centred best practice guideline (BPG). 

Spectrum Health Care (Spectrum), an RNAO Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®), is a home health organization with more than 200 nursing staff across three locations in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Spectrum chose to implement the 2015 Person- and Family-Centred Care (PFCC) Best Practice Guideline (BPG) to enhance person- and family-centred care and to reduce complaints regarding care. Members of the senior leadership team at Spectrum Health Care led implementation together with Spectrum’s Patient and Family Advisory Council.  

To support the practice change, Spectrum used the following implementation interventions:

  • Conducting a gap analysis to determine the knowledge/practice gap;
  • Holding education sessions for staff on person- and family-centred care best practices;
  • Revising their care processes to include review of care plans with the person and/or members of their family
  • Surveying staff members on their attitudes about person- and family-centred care via surveys
  • Developing staff education on communication strategies to support the assessment of a person’s care needs and care plans.

Person- and Family-Centred Best Practice Guideline

After implementing these interventions, Spectrum assessed the number of complaints received from persons receiving care per 1,000 care visits and compared that to their baseline. 

They found a decrease of 42 per cent of complaints from persons received over an 18-month time period at one of the sites that was implementing the PFCC BPG at Spectrum Health Care. 

At another site, an 80 per cent reduction in complaints was found following the staff education intervention.    

Data analyses overall indicated that the implementation of the PFCC BPG was highly successful in reducing persons' complaints regarding care.

Read more about Spectrum Health care’s results of implementing the PFCC BPG here: Slide 2 (rnao.ca)

Spectrum Health Care
Spectrum Health Care
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Sustain knowledge use Sustaining change

Sustaining the Assessment and Management of Pain Best Practice Guideline across a multi-site long-term care home

The Region of Peel, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®), has sustained the implementation of the Assessment and Management of Pain best practice guideline (BPG) for almost a decade. 

The Region of Peel, an RNAO Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) started implementing the RNAO Assessment and Management of Pain best practice guideline (BPG) in 2014 and has sustained its use since then. For example, in their 2019 BPSO annual report, they cited a continuous downward trend in the number of clients who reported a worsening of their pain. Pain experienced by the residents was better controlled, and the staff was found to assess, identify, and manage pain better by using the BPG.

Their keys to success include:

  • building on what works (for example, existing practices and policies)
  • empowering champions and growing their champion network
  • involving residents and families
  • gaining support from leaders and partners including RNAO, Peel of Region Leadership, Health Quality Ontario).
  • collaborating with an interdisciplinary team
  • conducting a formal sustainability evaluation

To learn more about The Region of Peel’s journey in sustaining the use of the Assessing and Managing Pain BPG, along with other BPGs, check out this webinar.

Region of Peel
Region of Peel

Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences

Engaging persons with lived experience

Integrating patient partners in change – Lessons learned from Kidney Health Australia

Kidnney Health Australia case study  

In early 2018, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) developed a guideline for managing percutaneous renal biopsies for individuals with chronic kidney disease (Scholes-Robertson et al., 2019). KHA included 40 persons from across Australia with lived experience of chronic kidney disease and their caregivers – “patient partners”. KHA asked patient partners to prioritize which topics were most important to them during a percutaneous renal biopsy.

Patient partners valued: minimizing discomfort and disruption, protecting their kidneys, enabling self-management, and making sure that support for families and caregivers would be available. They indicated that all of this would help alleviate anxiety and avoid undue stress. Their voices were heard, and KHA effectively incorporated these suggestions in guideline development.

Notably, there were marked differences between the priorities identified by the content experts on the guideline development working group, versus what the patient partners perceived to be important to their health and wellbeing, as shown in the table below.   

Topics prioritized by content experts

Topics prioritized by patient partners

  1. Cessation of antiplatelets
  2. Use of desmopressin acetate
  3. Imaging modality
  4. Needle type and size
  5. Bleeding
  6. Positioning
  7. Post-op care
  8. Biopsy information and education for patients and caregivers
  1. Reduce impact on family
  2. Health professional–person partnership
  3. Multidisciplinary care
  4. Anxiety management
  5. Support available to caregivers

Australia
Kidney Health Australia