Case studies
Social Movement Action Framework
Engaging collective strength in action at Central West Specialized Developmental Services
The change team at Central West Specialized Developmental Services (CWSDS) has built a strong core leadership structure to support their implementation efforts by including both formal and informal leaders.
Central West Specialized Developmental Services (CWSDS) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®.) During the BPSO pre-designation process, the CWSDS change team has built a strong core leadership structure to support the implementation of best practices, by including both formal and informal leaders.
The CWSDS change team relied on the following strategies to build a strong core leadership structure:
CWSDS’s RNAO-BPSO organizational structure. Figure provided with permission by CWSDS.
- embedding the RNAO BPSO pre-designation process within the organization’s strategic plan.
- emphasizing the interprofessional nature of the initiative by encouraging professionals from all disciplines to become involved.
- engaging an interprofessional team of stakeholders within the organization with the change, including direct support professionals, managers, food services, human resources staff, and members of the communication and information technology teams.
- encouraging stakeholders to become trained RNAO Best Practice Champions and to participate in RNAO events.
- making sure all stakeholders were informed and involved in the change initiative (by, for example, providing updates during managerial meetings and including stakeholders in completing gap analyses.)
- supporting Best Practice Champions in leading best practice guideline (BPG) implementation alongside the BPSO Steering Committee.
As a result of the change team’s work to build a core leadership structure, they were able to tailor the implementation of BPGs toward daily clinical problems relevant to their direct support professionals. This increased recognition of and support for their change initiative.
To learn more about CWSDS’s BPG implementation journey, watch their 38-minute webinar: Collective Strength in Action: How to Promote and Implement Best Practice Guidelines.
Engaging a network to strengthen alliances for an Indigenous school diabetes prevention project
An Indigenous diabetes prevention school project used a network to support community partner's capacity building and collaboration. Read more in this case study.
In Quebec, Canada, community groups and researchers participated in a network using social movement approaches for the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project. In the early phase of the social movement, the network supported capacity building and collaboration of the community members. As the movement evolved, the network strengthened alliances among the community members and their shared decision-making. It also supported the program’s expansion to more children. At the conclusion of the project, the network supported the emerging leadership of the community partners (Tremblay et al., 2018).
Advancing knowledge uptake and sustainability through RNAO's Best Practice Champions Network®
The Best Practice Champions Network® has been engaging change agents for over two decades to facilitate connection, a sense of belonging and a place to continue the implementation of best practice guidelines.
Launched in 2002, the RNAO Best Practice Champions Network® supports the active engagement of volunteer peer Best Practice Champions in knowledge exchange amongst one another, and between them and RNAO. Through this international network, more than 100,000 champions access tools and strategies such as workshops, webinars and online modules (Grinspun, 2018).
Knowledge-to-Action Framework
Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice – Lessons learned from DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing
DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. Staff at the sites identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice.
DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. They identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice. The assessment and identification of barriers allowed change teams to develop effective strategies for implementation with the input of stakeholders.
For example, for the implementation of the RNAO best practice guideline Assessment and management of foot ulcers for people with diabetes, barriers included
- nursing shortages across China,
- a lack of training to support the development of knowledge and skills in evidence-based nursing practice,
- the costs of guideline implementation. and
- practice recommendations that exceeded local nursing scope.
SOURCE: Transforming Nursing Through Knowledge, 2018.
Evaluating the impact of implementing the Person- and Family-Centred Care Best Practice Guideline at Spectrum Health Care
Spectrum Health Care, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) and home health organization, evaluated care outcomes after implementing the Person- and Family-Centred best practice guideline (BPG).
Spectrum Health Care (Spectrum), an RNAO Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®), is a home health organization with more than 200 nursing staff across three locations in the province of Ontario, Canada.
Spectrum chose to implement the 2015 Person- and Family-Centred Care (PFCC) Best Practice Guideline (BPG) to enhance person- and family-centred care and to reduce complaints regarding care. Members of the senior leadership team at Spectrum Health Care led implementation together with Spectrum’s Patient and Family Advisory Council.
To support the practice change, Spectrum used the following implementation interventions:
- Conducting a gap analysis to determine the knowledge/practice gap;
- Holding education sessions for staff on person- and family-centred care best practices;
- Revising their care processes to include review of care plans with the person and/or members of their family
- Surveying staff members on their attitudes about person- and family-centred care via surveys
- Developing staff education on communication strategies to support the assessment of a person’s care needs and care plans.
After implementing these interventions, Spectrum assessed the number of complaints received from persons receiving care per 1,000 care visits and compared that to their baseline.
They found a decrease of 42 per cent of complaints from persons received over an 18-month time period at one of the sites that was implementing the PFCC BPG at Spectrum Health Care.
At another site, an 80 per cent reduction in complaints was found following the staff education intervention.
Data analyses overall indicated that the implementation of the PFCC BPG was highly successful in reducing persons' complaints regarding care.
Read more about Spectrum Health care’s results of implementing the PFCC BPG here: Slide 2 (rnao.ca)
Sustaining the Assessment and Management of Pain Best Practice Guideline across a multi-site long-term care home
The Region of Peel, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®), has sustained the implementation of the Assessment and Management of Pain best practice guideline (BPG) for almost a decade.
The Region of Peel, an RNAO Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) started implementing the RNAO Assessment and Management of Pain best practice guideline (BPG) in 2014 and has sustained its use since then. For example, in their 2019 BPSO annual report, they cited a continuous downward trend in the number of clients who reported a worsening of their pain. Pain experienced by the residents was better controlled, and the staff was found to assess, identify, and manage pain better by using the BPG.
Their keys to success include:
- building on what works (for example, existing practices and policies)
- empowering champions and growing their champion network
- involving residents and families
- gaining support from leaders and partners including RNAO, Peel of Region Leadership, Health Quality Ontario).
- collaborating with an interdisciplinary team
- conducting a formal sustainability evaluation
To learn more about The Region of Peel’s journey in sustaining the use of the Assessing and Managing Pain BPG, along with other BPGs, check out this webinar.
Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences
Integrating patient partners in change – Lessons learned from Kidney Health Australia
Kidnney Health Australia case study
In early 2018, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) developed a guideline for managing percutaneous renal biopsies for individuals with chronic kidney disease (Scholes-Robertson et al., 2019). KHA included 40 persons from across Australia with lived experience of chronic kidney disease and their caregivers – “patient partners”. KHA asked patient partners to prioritize which topics were most important to them during a percutaneous renal biopsy.
Patient partners valued: minimizing discomfort and disruption, protecting their kidneys, enabling self-management, and making sure that support for families and caregivers would be available. They indicated that all of this would help alleviate anxiety and avoid undue stress. Their voices were heard, and KHA effectively incorporated these suggestions in guideline development.
Notably, there were marked differences between the priorities identified by the content experts on the guideline development working group, versus what the patient partners perceived to be important to their health and wellbeing, as shown in the table below.
|
Topics prioritized by content experts |
Topics prioritized by patient partners |
|
|
