Case studies

Social Movement Action Framework

Social Movement Action Framework, Changes is scaled Sustaining change

Scaling up, scaling out and scaling deep a fall prevention initiative

A joint fall prevention program by RNAO and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) that was scaled up, scaled out and scaled deep.  

RNAO’s Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) program itself was scaled up, scaled out and scaled deep – on the national level – when RNAO and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) entered into a formal partnership on a pan-Canadian falls prevention initiative campaign in 2007, with a focus on long-term care (LTC) (McConnell et al., 2018).

This collaboration involved the implementation of best practices, capacity building at the micro and meso levels with individuals and organizations, and engagement with national partners. The work was informed by the first and second editions of RNAO’s best practice guideline (BPG) Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries in the Older Adult and CPSI’s program Safer Healthcare Now! on falls prevention as a critical patient safety issue Reducing Falls and Injuries from Falls.

The National Collaborative on Falls Prevention in Long-Term Care, launched in 2008–2009, included staff from 32 LTC homes and an interprofessional expert panel. The goals of the collaborative:

  1. to reduce the rate of falls in older adults by educating and training staff and patients about fall prevention
  2. develop a forum for improvement teams
  3. participate in a methodology on quality improvement initiatives using the Model for Improvement (Langley et al., 2009).

The collaboration was highly successful – process indicators showed decreased rates of falls in the LTC homes following implementation. However, it was determined that more time and support would be needed to scale the fall prevention initiative out and deep to in order to embed and sustain the practice changes. 

In 2010–2011, the collaborative expanded to a national campaign where the program was delivered virtually to more than 45 organizations from diverse health sectors using web-based technology. This enabled greater access to the program with impressive outcomes, and showed that technology could be used as a tool to scale the program up and out.

This was followed up by creation and delivery of a fall prevention learning series in 2011–2012 to strengthen the uptake and sustainability of best practices. The training integrated implementation science, change theory and quality improvement methodology. As with the other collaboration components, the outcomes of the learning series demonstrated improvements in practice changes and reductions in falls causing injury, and organizational policies to support and sustain the change. The continued use of evaluation to determine outcomes and impact as part of quality improvement and using ongoing audit and feedback demonstrated a change that was scaled deep. 

The collaboration helped embed principles of social action movement by its focus on a credible and important shared concern – preventing falls – where urgent change was needed. Momentum was used to support the continued engagement of fall prevention champions across sectors. Networks were used to share resources and expand collaborations across communities.          ​​​​​​

Ontario
CPSI ICSP
Social Movement Action Framework, Capacity in leading change Outcomes Sustaining change

Building capacity in change agents for health innovation and transformation

United Kingdom junior doctors increased their capacity as change agents after mobilizing and implementing the WHO surgical checklist. 

Although positioned as the “future leaders of health-care transformation and innovation,” junior doctors (or interns) in the United Kingdom actually receive very little training in leadership competencies at medical schools to prepare for this role (Carson-Steven et al., 2013). Instead, they learn in clinical environments that are frequently unreceptive to change and innovation informed by best practices.

To overcome these barriers and emerge as leaders, a group of junior doctors chose to independently learn how to innovate and champion evidence-based practice by applying social movement approaches including mobilizing for change. By participating in programs, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s “Open Schools,” they built capacity in social movement thinking and actions and used their knowledge, skills, networks and experiential learning to drive change in their clinical practice. 

The junior doctors applied social movement actions when they led a change initiative to implement the World Health Organization’s guidelines on the use of surgical safety checklists for patient safety. They co-created a supportive learning community to learn together and from one another and to overcome obstacles and resistance. As emerging leaders, they engaged in collective action, including organizing a “teach-in” to raise awareness about the urgent need for change and the implementation of best practices in surgical care as determined through evidence. And, each doctor committed to recruiting colleagues to strengthen the social movement and build momentum and a critical mass.

For more details, see The social movement drive: a role for junior doctors in healthcare reform - PubMed (nih.gov).

United Kingdom
Surgical Safety Checklist
Social Movement Action Framework, Preconditions Receptivity to change

The Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalition

A coalition of community partners who took action and created change for cancer prevention and promotion. 

In Alabama, United States, a public health community coalition targeting breast and cervical cancer prevention engaged in grassroots advocacy to influence policy and legislation for smoke-free spaces (Wynn et al., 2011).

This coalition was made up of local stakeholders, including an interdisciplinary committee of government officials, faith-based organizations, academics, researchers and volunteers. Their collective efforts were effective in part because the people involved were receptive to change. 

There was a strong impetus for change caused by these concurrent factors:

  • data showing an unequal burden of cancers among Black Americans due in part to higher rates of tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure.
  • recognition that the risk of cancers could be lowered by: implementing evidence-informed strategies; increasing public awareness and advocacy; and promoting healthy public policy.  
  • the coalition’s commitment to creating social change by improving the health and well-being of the community to achieve positive health outcomes.
  • public support for the establishment of legislated smoke-free areas, evident from the results of local and national Gallup polls.
  • an understanding of the powerful impact of social movement actions to create change.

This receptivity to change led the coalition to engage in social movement actions. They became empowered by learning strategies to lead change; they realized the power of their collective voices and mobilized actions. They felt their actions were timely and needed due to the data indicating rising cancer levels amongst Black Americans. They were committed to taking action to address and rectify health inequities.                

Alabama, USA
Alabama Cancer Coalition

Knowledge-to-Action Framework

Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Evaluate outcomes Sustaining change

Applying the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to reduce wound infections at Perley Health

A case study on reducing wound infections at Perley Health in Ottawa, Ontario to advance best practices using the Knowledge-to-Action framework. 

Perley Health is a designate Long-Term Care Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) which demonstrates a strong commitment to providing evidence-based care. During the pandemic, the team identified skin and wound infection as a clinical concern among their residents. Consistent with the literature, residents at Perley Health experiencing comorbid medical conditions such as frailty, diabetes, and arterial and venous insufficiency were at increased risk for chronic wound infections [1]. Chronic wounds are a prime environment for bacteria, including biofilm, making wound infection a common problem [2] [3]. Managing biofilm, which can affect wound healing by creating chronic inflammation or infection [3], becomes crucial as up to 80 per cent of infections are caused by this type of bacteria [4] [5].

To adopt and integrate best practices, the team at Perley Health decided to implement the Assessment and Management of Pressure Injuries for the Interprofessional Team best practice guideline (BPG). To support a systematic approach to change, four of the action cycle phases of the Knowledge-to-Action Framework, from the Leading Change Toolkit [6] are highlighted below.

Image
Cover image of RNAO's Assessment and Management of Pressure Injuries for the Interprofessional Team
Identify the problem 

Perley Health’s wound care protocol was audited and the following gaps were identified based on current evidence:

  • Aseptic wound cleansing technic could be improved, as nonsterile gauze was used for wound cleansing.
  • Wound cleaning solution was not effective to manage microbial load in chronic wounds
  • Baseline wound infection data were collected on the number of infected wounds within the organization each month over three years and is ongoing

Adapt to local context

The project was supported by key formal and informal leaders within the organization including the Nurse Specialized in Wounds, Ostomy and continence (NSWOC), the Director of Clinical Practice, a team of wound care champions, the IPAC team and material management. Staff was motivated to improve resident outcomes by lowering infection rates which facilitated the project but many continued to use old supplies so as to not waste material. Providing the rationale for the change and associated best practices improved knowledge uptake, as did removing old supplies to cut down on confusion. Barriers the team encountered included staff turnover and educating new team members.

Select, tailor, implement interventions

The interventions listed below were selected, tailored and implemented based on the evidence that was adapted to the local context. They were purposely chosen to support the clinical teams’ needs on busy units and to creatively overcome staffing challenges. Interventions included:

  • use of a wound cleanser containing an antimicrobial
  • use of sterile equipment for wound care, including sterile gauze
  • creation of a wound-cleansing protocol was created to reflect best practice
  • updating and approval of a policy by the Risk Assessment and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers team in collaboration with the director of clinical practice

Perley Health also created and delivered education in two formats designed to be accessible to front-line staff:

  • Just-in-Time education was provided on every unit, on every shift, to registered staff by the NSWOC on all shift sets, over a one-month period. Wound care champions were available on each shift to aid in learning and answer additional questions to support the team’s needs.
  • A continuing education online learning module was created and uploaded onto Perley Health’s Surge learning platform. Training is included in new hire onboarding and mandatory for yearly education.
    Image
    A photo of a nurse practicing using a would cleanser for a pressure injury

 An RPN demonstrating how to cleanse a wound using wound cleanser at Perley Health

Evaluate outcomes

Evaluation indicators were selected to determine the impact of the implementation interventions when compared to baseline data, including the rate of wound and skin infections per 1,000 days.  A 50 per cent reduction in wound infections was identified following the implementation of the identified change strategies and education above. 

This graph represents four years of data collection on wound infections at Perley Health. Three years of baseline data and one year of post-implementation data are highlighted in red.

Image
Graph - Perley

References

  1. Azevedo, M., Lisboa, C., & Rodrigues, A. (2020). Chronic wounds and novel therapeutic approaches. British Journal of Community Nursing, 25 (12), S26-s32.
  2. Landis, S.J. (2008). Chronic Wound Infection and Antimicrobial Use. Advances in Skin & Wound Care, 21 (11), p 531-540.
  3. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (2016). Clinical best practice guidelines: Assessment and management of pressure injuries for the interprofessional team (3rd ed.). Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario: Toronto, ON.
  4. Jamal, M., Ahmad, W., Andleeb, S., Jalil, F., Imran, M., Nawaz. M., Hussain, T., Ali, M., Rafiq, M., & Kamil, M.A. (2018). Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. J Chin Med Assoc. 81(1): 7-11.
  5. Murphy, C., Atkin, L., Swanson, T., Tachi, M., Tan, Y.K., De Ceniga, M.V., Weir, D., Wolcott, R., Ĉernohorská, J., Ciprandi, G., Dissemond, J., James, G.A., Hurlow, J., Lázaro MartÍnez, J.L., Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska, B., & Wilson, P. (2020). Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibiofilm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. J Wound Care, (Sup3b):S1-S26.
  6. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (2022). Leading change toolkit: Knowledge-to-action framework. https://rnao.ca/leading-change-toolkit Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario: Toronto, ON.
Ottawa, Ontario
Pressure Injuries
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Assess barriers/facilitators to knowledge use

Overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice – Lessons learned from DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing

DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. Staff at the sites identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice.   

DongZhiMen Hospital and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (BUCM) School of Nursing are international BPSOs in Beijing, China. They identified barriers to the use of evidence in practice including heavy workloads, cultural differences and reluctant attitudes about using evidence to inform practice. The assessment and identification of barriers allowed change teams to develop effective strategies for implementation with the input of stakeholders.

For example, for the implementation of the RNAO best practice guideline Assessment and management of foot ulcers for people with diabetes, barriers included

  • nursing shortages across China,
  • a lack of training to support the development of knowledge and skills in evidence-based nursing practice,
  • the costs of guideline implementation. and
  • practice recommendations that exceeded local nursing scope.

SOURCE: Transforming Nursing Through Knowledge, 2018.

Beijing, China
Beijing School of Nursing
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Adapt to local context

Adapting BPG recommendations to a public health context – Insights from Toronto Public Health

Toronto Public Health – a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) - has adapted several RNAO best practice guidelines (BPGs) to align with a population health approach. 

Toronto Public Health – a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Toronto, Canada – has implemented several RNAO best practice guidelines (BPGs), including Woman Abuse: Screening, Identification and Initial Response (2005) and Preventing and Addressing Abuse and Neglect of Older Adults (2014). Because some practice recommendations in these guidelines focus on the individual person or patient level, they didn’t always align with Toronto Public Health’s population health approach.

To adapt recommendations to the public health context, the change team completed a literature review to explore definitions and adapt strategies to align with the model of care delivery and health promotion philosophy.

Another approach that was taken by Toronto Public Health: piloting BPG recommendations within one small program team. The team would then evaluate the implementation until successful, consistent with the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach). Once successful, the intervention was scaled up within the organization to other programs and teams (Timmings et al., 2018).

Toronto Public Health
Toronto public health logo

Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences

Engaging persons with lived experience

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital: Co-designing change through the active engagement of persons with lived experience

A case study from Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital focused on engaging persons with lived experience in a change process. 

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital (hereafter referred to as Holland Bloorview) is a designated Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  Holland Bloorview has an award-winning Family Leadership Program (FLP), through which family leaders partner with the organization and the Bloorview Research Institute to co-design, shape, and improve services, programs, and policies. Family leaders are families and caregivers who have received services at Holland Bloorview, and have lived experiences of paediatric disability. Family leaders’ roles include being a mentor to other families, an advisor to committees and working groups, and faculty who co-teach workshops to students and other families. 

Image
Family leader roles from Holland Bloorview

 Family Leader Roles at Holland Bloorview. Photo provided with permission by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital.

The ENFit Working Group is an example of a successful implementation co-design process within Holland Bloorview. The ENFit Working Group is an interprofessional team working on the adoption of a new type of connection on products used for enteral feeding  [feeding directly through the stomach or intestine via a tube]. By introducing the ENFit system, a best practice safety standard, the working group plans to reduce the risk of disconnecting the feeding tube from other medical tubes, and thus decrease harm to children and youth who require enteral feeding.

Image
Family partnering graphic

Family Partnering with the EnFit Working Group. Photo provided with permission by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital. 

The working group invited a family member and leader whose son had received services at Holland Bloorview. This family member had significant lived experience with enteral feeding management, enteral medication administration, and other complexities associated with enteral products. During the meetings, great attention was given to the potential impacts on persons and families. The group engaged the family member by:

  • co-creating the implementation plan
  • involving them in a failure mode affects analysis, which highlighted the impact of the feeding tube supplies on transitions to home, school, and other care settings
  • working with the family member to advocate for safe transitions within the provincial pediatric system, which led to the development of the Ontario Pediatric ENFit Group

To learn more about Holland Bloorview’s experience in partnering with families in a co-design process, watch their 38-minute webinar: The Power of Family Partnerships.

Toronto, Ontario
Image of two children running in a field