Case studies

Social Movement Action Framework

Social Movement Action Framework, Changes is scaled Sustaining change

Scaling up, scaling out and scaling deep a fall prevention initiative

A joint fall prevention program by RNAO and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) that was scaled up, scaled out and scaled deep.  

RNAO’s Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) program itself was scaled up, scaled out and scaled deep – on the national level – when RNAO and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) entered into a formal partnership on a pan-Canadian falls prevention initiative campaign in 2007, with a focus on long-term care (LTC) (McConnell et al., 2018).

This collaboration involved the implementation of best practices, capacity building at the micro and meso levels with individuals and organizations, and engagement with national partners. The work was informed by the first and second editions of RNAO’s best practice guideline (BPG) Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries in the Older Adult and CPSI’s program Safer Healthcare Now! on falls prevention as a critical patient safety issue Reducing Falls and Injuries from Falls.

The National Collaborative on Falls Prevention in Long-Term Care, launched in 2008–2009, included staff from 32 LTC homes and an interprofessional expert panel. The goals of the collaborative:

  1. to reduce the rate of falls in older adults by educating and training staff and patients about fall prevention
  2. develop a forum for improvement teams
  3. participate in a methodology on quality improvement initiatives using the Model for Improvement (Langley et al., 2009).

The collaboration was highly successful – process indicators showed decreased rates of falls in the LTC homes following implementation. However, it was determined that more time and support would be needed to scale the fall prevention initiative out and deep to in order to embed and sustain the practice changes. 

In 2010–2011, the collaborative expanded to a national campaign where the program was delivered virtually to more than 45 organizations from diverse health sectors using web-based technology. This enabled greater access to the program with impressive outcomes, and showed that technology could be used as a tool to scale the program up and out.

This was followed up by creation and delivery of a fall prevention learning series in 2011–2012 to strengthen the uptake and sustainability of best practices. The training integrated implementation science, change theory and quality improvement methodology. As with the other collaboration components, the outcomes of the learning series demonstrated improvements in practice changes and reductions in falls causing injury, and organizational policies to support and sustain the change. The continued use of evaluation to determine outcomes and impact as part of quality improvement and using ongoing audit and feedback demonstrated a change that was scaled deep. 

The collaboration helped embed principles of social action movement by its focus on a credible and important shared concern – preventing falls – where urgent change was needed. Momentum was used to support the continued engagement of fall prevention champions across sectors. Networks were used to share resources and expand collaborations across communities.          ​​​​​​

Ontario
CPSI ICSP
Social Movement Action Framework, Capacity in leading change Outcomes Sustaining change

Building capacity in change agents for health innovation and transformation

United Kingdom junior doctors increased their capacity as change agents after mobilizing and implementing the WHO surgical checklist. 

Although positioned as the “future leaders of health-care transformation and innovation,” junior doctors (or interns) in the United Kingdom actually receive very little training in leadership competencies at medical schools to prepare for this role (Carson-Steven et al., 2013). Instead, they learn in clinical environments that are frequently unreceptive to change and innovation informed by best practices.

To overcome these barriers and emerge as leaders, a group of junior doctors chose to independently learn how to innovate and champion evidence-based practice by applying social movement approaches including mobilizing for change. By participating in programs, such as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s “Open Schools,” they built capacity in social movement thinking and actions and used their knowledge, skills, networks and experiential learning to drive change in their clinical practice. 

The junior doctors applied social movement actions when they led a change initiative to implement the World Health Organization’s guidelines on the use of surgical safety checklists for patient safety. They co-created a supportive learning community to learn together and from one another and to overcome obstacles and resistance. As emerging leaders, they engaged in collective action, including organizing a “teach-in” to raise awareness about the urgent need for change and the implementation of best practices in surgical care as determined through evidence. And, each doctor committed to recruiting colleagues to strengthen the social movement and build momentum and a critical mass.

For more details, see The social movement drive: a role for junior doctors in healthcare reform - PubMed (nih.gov).

United Kingdom
Surgical Safety Checklist
Social Movement Action Framework, Preconditions Receptivity to change

The Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalition

A coalition of community partners who took action and created change for cancer prevention and promotion. 

In Alabama, United States, a public health community coalition targeting breast and cervical cancer prevention engaged in grassroots advocacy to influence policy and legislation for smoke-free spaces (Wynn et al., 2011).

This coalition was made up of local stakeholders, including an interdisciplinary committee of government officials, faith-based organizations, academics, researchers and volunteers. Their collective efforts were effective in part because the people involved were receptive to change. 

There was a strong impetus for change caused by these concurrent factors:

  • data showing an unequal burden of cancers among Black Americans due in part to higher rates of tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure.
  • recognition that the risk of cancers could be lowered by: implementing evidence-informed strategies; increasing public awareness and advocacy; and promoting healthy public policy.  
  • the coalition’s commitment to creating social change by improving the health and well-being of the community to achieve positive health outcomes.
  • public support for the establishment of legislated smoke-free areas, evident from the results of local and national Gallup polls.
  • an understanding of the powerful impact of social movement actions to create change.

This receptivity to change led the coalition to engage in social movement actions. They became empowered by learning strategies to lead change; they realized the power of their collective voices and mobilized actions. They felt their actions were timely and needed due to the data indicating rising cancer levels amongst Black Americans. They were committed to taking action to address and rectify health inequities.                

Alabama, USA
Alabama Cancer Coalition

Knowledge-to-Action Framework

Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Adapt to local context

Adapting BPG recommendations to a public health context – Insights from Toronto Public Health

Toronto Public Health – a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) - has adapted several RNAO best practice guidelines (BPGs) to align with a population health approach. 

Toronto Public Health – a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Toronto, Canada – has implemented several RNAO best practice guidelines (BPGs), including Woman Abuse: Screening, Identification and Initial Response (2005) and Preventing and Addressing Abuse and Neglect of Older Adults (2014). Because some practice recommendations in these guidelines focus on the individual person or patient level, they didn’t always align with Toronto Public Health’s population health approach.

To adapt recommendations to the public health context, the change team completed a literature review to explore definitions and adapt strategies to align with the model of care delivery and health promotion philosophy.

Another approach that was taken by Toronto Public Health: piloting BPG recommendations within one small program team. The team would then evaluate the implementation until successful, consistent with the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach). Once successful, the intervention was scaled up within the organization to other programs and teams (Timmings et al., 2018).

Toronto Public Health
Toronto public health logo
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Adapt to local context

Adapting BPG recommendations to a Chinese acute care context to reform care delivery– lessons learned from DongZhiMen Hospital

Care practices were revised using adapted evidence-based best practice guidelines in an acute care facility in Beijing, China. 

DongZhiMen Hospital – a BPSO in Beijing China – was motivated to reform care delivery through the use of RNAO BPGs. While best practice recommendations provided general guidance, DongZhimen Hospital identified the need to translate these statements into detailed instructions and parameters tailored to their specific hospital context.

To adapt statements to their context, they translated the guideline into Chinese. A multidisciplinary team then worked through the initial steps of the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. This involved:

  • reviewing carefully the evidence to thoroughly understand the intent of the recommendations
  • conducting a comprehensive gap analysis
  • interviewing staff members and others to identify facilitators and barriers to the use of the BPG.

Using this information, the team was able to create specific, clinical nursing practice standards derived from the recommendations and relevant to their context (Hailing and Runxi, 2018).

DongZhiMen Hospital, Beijing, China
Dong Zhi Men Hospital
Knowledge-to-Action Framework, Assess barriers/facilitators to knowledge use

Facilitating an evidence-based culture at Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael’s Hospital

Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael’s Hospital, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) has embedded evidence-based practices into its culture and daily work processes as part of its corporate strategy. 

Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael’s Hospital, a Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Toronto, Canada, has embedded evidence-based practices into its culture and daily work processes. Evidence-based practice is part of the hospital’s corporate strategy. It has invested resources to build a critical mass (over 30 per cent) of staff members who are best practice champions.

Image
Heather McConnell, former Director, IABPG Centre, at St. Mike's Hospital Gallery Walk

The hospital also provides multiple capacity-building opportunities, including a community of practice, boot camps, booster sessions and mentorship. The annual Nursing Week Gallery Walk, depicted in the image above, is just one way that St. Michael’s Hospital profiles the work of champions and others dedicated to using evidence to inform change initiatives.

SOURCE: Transforming Nursing Through Knowledge, 2018.

Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital
Unity Health Toronto

Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences

Engaging persons with lived experience

Integrating patient partners in change – Lessons learned from Kidney Health Australia

Kidnney Health Australia case study  

In early 2018, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) developed a guideline for managing percutaneous renal biopsies for individuals with chronic kidney disease (Scholes-Robertson et al., 2019). KHA included 40 persons from across Australia with lived experience of chronic kidney disease and their caregivers – “patient partners”. KHA asked patient partners to prioritize which topics were most important to them during a percutaneous renal biopsy.

Patient partners valued: minimizing discomfort and disruption, protecting their kidneys, enabling self-management, and making sure that support for families and caregivers would be available. They indicated that all of this would help alleviate anxiety and avoid undue stress. Their voices were heard, and KHA effectively incorporated these suggestions in guideline development.

Notably, there were marked differences between the priorities identified by the content experts on the guideline development working group, versus what the patient partners perceived to be important to their health and wellbeing, as shown in the table below.   

Topics prioritized by content experts

Topics prioritized by patient partners

  1. Cessation of antiplatelets
  2. Use of desmopressin acetate
  3. Imaging modality
  4. Needle type and size
  5. Bleeding
  6. Positioning
  7. Post-op care
  8. Biopsy information and education for patients and caregivers
  1. Reduce impact on family
  2. Health professional–person partnership
  3. Multidisciplinary care
  4. Anxiety management
  5. Support available to caregivers

Australia
Kidney Health Australia