Case studies
Social Movement Action Framework
Strengthening health systems: The experience of the National Health Forum in El Salvador (2009 - 2018)
A nationwide social movement in El Salvador from 2009 to 2018 supported the achievement of the National Health Forum and exemplified goals and outcomes being met by activists. Read more in this case study.
The National Health Forum (NHF), a nationwide popular movement in El Salvador, played a central role in the development of the National Public Health System from 2009 to 2018 (León et al., 2020). It is part of a global movement that aims to build coalitions and networks. The People’s Health Movement (PHM) brought together grassroots health activists, civil society organizations and academic institutions from around the world to address the social, environmental, and economic determinants of health (Kapilashrami et al., 2016).
The NHF provides a strong example of community participation and exemplifies a social movement with fully achieved goals. Formally created in 2010, the NHF had three fundamental goals that were met via social movement actions:
- to build people’s power and strengthen the organizational fabric
- to stand against the idea that previous governments held of privatizing health care
- to stimulate and promote effective social participation in health
The NHF developed three community participation strategies that played a role in strengthening El Salvador’s national public health system. These strategies are: (1) building capacity among local community leaders to become effective decision-makers at all levels of the health-care system, (2) responding to and prioritizing the needs identified by the community for the sector-specific working groups, and (3) advocating for policies based on human rights.
“The NHF was born with high participation of different social movements, all united in the same direction. There were a series of problems, as they wanted to privatize health care […] The NHF was created when the health reform came into being. We, the NHF, are part of the reform” – NHF member
Advocating for change through the Alzheimer's Association
The Alzheimer's Association was started by activists committed to advancing Alzheimer's knowledge through research.
The Alzheimer’s Association (Alzheimer's Association | Alzheimer's Disease & Dementia Help) was founded in 1980 by a group of family care providers and individuals who supported the need for an organization dedicated to support the needs of caregivers facing Alzheimer’s and to advance knowledge through research. As early activists for the Alzheimer’s movement, they sought to break down the silence of Alzheimer’s and learn more about the disease, including prevention, treatment and a cure.
Through a people-led approach, the association reaches millions of people globally through a multi-pronged approach grounded in individual and collective action. Advocacy to give all persons living with Alzheimer’s access to the support services they need includes strategies such as launching awareness campaigns and grassroots campaigns to impact legislation.
With multiple chapters throughout North America and globally, the Alzheimer’s Association includes a network of advocates and allies. These include other Alzheimer’s organizations, universities engaged in research, corporations and pharmaceuticals. As an example of a civil society organization, the Alzheimer’s Association is a community-based non-profit organization that has protected and advocated for the needs and interests of persons and families living with Alzheimer’s for over 40 years.
Scaling up change to address hunger and food waste through The Campus Kitchens Project
The Campus Kitchens Project was an effective scaled up change initiative that addressed food insecurity. read more in this case study.
The Campus Kitchens Project (CKP) is an example of a successful scaled-up change initiative. Founded in 2001 as a branch of a community kitchen initiative that targeted food insecurity in Washington, D.C., United States, this non-profit is the first and largest student-led social movement taking on the crisis of food waste and hunger in the United States (Larson et al., 2017). More than 30,000 students in 63 universities, colleges and high schools are now repurposing unwanted or surplus food to provide meals to people who have food insecurity.
Working in leadership teams, student leaders and volunteers on campuses receive education, training and coaching over a period of several months to help empower people, families and communities on topics including:
- food insecurity
- improving social and nutritional health by increasing food knowledge and helping others developing cooking skills
The Campus Kitchen Project also establishes community partnerships with existing local organizations that provide services and food to individuals already challenged with food insecurity, such as senior housing facilities, youth outreach groups and churches. Local leadership teams also partner with dining services that operate large foodservice kitchens and dining halls and engage student groups and faculty advisors.
Student teams carry out different functions. While some teams focus on improving the way that homeless shelters prepare and deliver meals, other teams host communal dinners, partner with senior centers, or improve transportation to improve access to food.
“Instead of more branch offices or trying to provide all the services in-house, we find universities and students to partner with who already have the necessary resources on campus and want to do this kind of community impact work. Turning our nation’s institutions of higher education into hubs for replication and ongoing innovation could be the superhighway to scaling up for any nonprofit.” - Laura Toscano, Director, The Campus Kitchens Project
Knowledge-to-Action Framework
Identifying the problem at Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute (FCI-IC) to achieve excellence in care
Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute is an acute care facility with a goal of achieving excellence in care in the prioritized areas of fall prevention and wound care.
Cardioinfantil Foundation of Cardiology Institute (FCI-IC) is a 340-bed hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Recognizing that the use of best practice guidelines (BPG) for nursing care was uncommon in Colombia, they joined RNAO’s Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) program with the goal of achieving excellence in care.
FCI-IC had 10 years of evaluation data that revealed problems in specific clinical areas such as fall prevention and wound care. They conducted a baseline diagnostic evaluation to identify the highest priority problems to tackle and to select the most appropriate guidelines and best practice recommendations. As part of this, they surveyed their key partners in the change to learn more about their use of assessment tools, the status of electronic medical records, routine clinical practices such as the use of bed rails, and prevalence data.
This assessment process led to them selecting three RNAO BPGs as knowledge tools: Prevention of Falls and Fall Injuries in the Older Adult, Risk Assessment and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, and Assessment and Management of Foot Ulcers for People with Diabetes.
Conducting gap analyses to successfully implement new clinical practices at Tilbury Manor
Tilbury Manor, a long-term care home, chose to focus on provincially-mandated “required programs” when seeking to improve resident care using a gap analysis.
Tilbury Manor, a 75-resident long-term care home in Tilbury chose to focus on provincially-mandated “required programs” (fall prevention, skin and wound care, continence care, bowel management and pain management) when seeking to improve resident care.
They conducted a gap analysis to compare their current practices with the best practices outlined in related RNAO best practice guidelines. Their analysis included an assessment of clinical practices, policies and documentation systems. The results of the gap analysis helped them create specific action plans.
Tilbury Manor then formed project teams led by nurses and supported by a team of champions. These teams proceeded to educate staff, implement new clinical practices, conduct care reviews and conduct audits.
Multiple positive outcomes were reported as a result of implementing these best practices including reductions in reports of pain, less use of restraints, and less falls, pressure ulcers and urinary tract infections.
Adapting the Person- and Family-Centred Care best practice guideline to local context at Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre
Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Sioux Lookout, a town in Northwestern Ontario. The service area is remote, isolated and encompasses 385,000 square kilometres, with a population that is 85 per cent First Nations. Learn more how this site adapted guidelines to their local context in this case study.
Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) is a pre-designate Best Practice Spotlight Organization® (BPSO®) in Sioux Lookout, a town in Northwestern Ontario. SLMHC is a hub for inpatient and outpatient hospital services, providing services to including Sioux Lookout and 28 northern communities. The service area is remote, isolated and encompasses 385,000 square kilometres, with a population that is 85 per cent First Nations.
As part of its pre-designation process, the SLMHC change team implemented the Person- and Family- Centred Care (PFCC) best practice guideline (BPG). During implementation, the SLMHC change team worked to adapt the PFCC BPG to the local context of their organization in order to best serve the needs of the population in the surrounding areas as well as in other remote communities.
The SLMCH local context posed unique challenges. Among these:
- Standard guidance on privacy did not always apply to members of the First Nations communities served. Some members wished to have their health information shared with their chief and community.
- Some people must travel as far as 400 or 500 kilometers to return home after discharge from SLMHC. Thus, it was essential to arrange appropriate care transitions and make sure people being discharged would not lose personal belongings.
The SLMHC change team adapted the PFCC BPG to the local context by:
SLMHC Patient Oriented Discharge Summary. Shared with permission.
- placing names on the doors of the hospital rooms of some individuals, so their community members could stop by and visit.
- creating a Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) that included the following options to indicate the person’s preferences regarding sharing their health information:
- I agree to my health information being shared with________
- I do not agree with my health information being disclosed to people in my community (for example, band or council)
- creating a detailed staff checklist within the PODS to ensure safe care transitions (by, for example, faxing the completed form to an external Indigenous Transition Navigator, or listing personal items collected from the room).
- working with an Indigenous Transitions Facilitator, whose roles include conducting follow-up phone calls with the person, patient rounding, and coordinating safe transitions.
After successfully creating a tailored PODS that meets the need of the population they serve, SLMHC has been able to better support person- and family-centred care principles within the organization.
Shared with permission by Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre
Engaging Persons with Lived Experiences
Integrating patient partners in change – Lessons learned from Kidney Health Australia
Kidnney Health Australia case study
In early 2018, Kidney Health Australia (KHA) developed a guideline for managing percutaneous renal biopsies for individuals with chronic kidney disease (Scholes-Robertson et al., 2019). KHA included 40 persons from across Australia with lived experience of chronic kidney disease and their caregivers – “patient partners”. KHA asked patient partners to prioritize which topics were most important to them during a percutaneous renal biopsy.
Patient partners valued: minimizing discomfort and disruption, protecting their kidneys, enabling self-management, and making sure that support for families and caregivers would be available. They indicated that all of this would help alleviate anxiety and avoid undue stress. Their voices were heard, and KHA effectively incorporated these suggestions in guideline development.
Notably, there were marked differences between the priorities identified by the content experts on the guideline development working group, versus what the patient partners perceived to be important to their health and wellbeing, as shown in the table below.
|
Topics prioritized by content experts |
Topics prioritized by patient partners |
|
|
