A key feature of the Leading Change Toolkit is the inclusion of two complementary implementation frameworks. Combined, the Social Movement Action (SMA) Framework and the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework, create a powerful, novel approach that can support you and your change team to lead a practice change using an evidence-based resource, like an RNAO Best Practice Guideline (BPG). Throughout the Leading Change Toolkit, you will find examples of linkages between the two frameworks so you can apply both frameworks together and accelerate your success.
Leading a practice change can be a process with lots to consider. Using both frameworks (or starting with one and adding a second later) can help guide this work and support the development of the knowledge, skills and confidence that are needed for change agents. As the SMA and KTA Frameworks have multiple components, there are sections in the Leading Change Toolkit detailing each part. As your initiative may also include person/patient and family engagement, a section on this has also been included. Throughout the Leading Change Toolkit, you will find examples of linkages between the SMA and KTA Frameworks to help you apply both frameworks together to accelerate your success.
How do the SMA and KTA Frameworks work together?
The SMA and KTA Frameworks are both dynamic, responsive and powerful approaches to change. Both frameworks:
- support the uptake and sustainability of knowledge to create innovation
- lead to positive and lasting outcomes, such as quality improvement, patient safety and excellence in care
Both frameworks also require engaged leadership by change agents and/or change teams, and other stakeholders, including persons/patients and their families.
When combined, the SMA and KTA Frameworks provide change agents and change teams a novel strategy to implementation that pairs:
- grassroots actions in response to an urgent shared concern and/or a strongly desired change (SMA Framework); and
- a systematic and structured approach to an identified problem (KTA Framework).
What do I need to know about each framework?
Here are some key points about each framework.
Social Movement Action: The SMA Framework is a people-led "bottom-up" approach to practice change. This approach develops in response to a strong desire for change or a shared concern, and a readiness for action.
The SMA Framework includes many components of social movements that have demonstrated impact and long-term benefits on evidence uptake and sustainability. The framework’s 16 elements are structured according to three broad timepoints:
- Preconditions: the conditions that must be in place prior to the social movement;
- Key Characteristics: the features that must be present for a social movement to occur; and
- Outcomes: the results emanating from the social movement undertaken.
Knowledge-to-Action: The KTA Framework is a planned, structured and cyclical approach to change that integrates two related components:
- knowledge creation; and
- an action cycle consisting of seven phases: identifying; adapting; assessing; selecting; monitoring; evaluating; and sustaining.
Why should I consider combining both frameworks in my change initiative?
Both frameworks are flexible and effective at supporting and accelerating change initiatives. Reasons for combining these two complementary approaches in your change initiative include:
- speeding up the change process because of the combined effects of two approaches that apply knowledge from two different disciplines, health and social sciences;
- promoting greater collaboration between change agents by breaking down the hierarchies and individual silos of traditional top-down methods such as those in the KTA Framework;
- reducing barriers to change by engaging both formal leaders through elements of the KTA Framework and informal leaders through elements of the SMA Framework;
- supporting the creation of positive evidence-based outcomes at multiple levels - micro (individual), meso (organizational), and system (macro); and
- making lasting change and improvements by furthering the capacity of change agents to expand their knowledge, skills and actions.