Advanced Clinical Practice Fellowships

RNAO ACPF Simulation Fellowship

Summary

Approximately 30% of Canadian newborn males are circumcised (Kim et al., 2019). Yet, formalized training is not available to physicians performing newborn circumcisions, who are in the vast majority non-surgeons (e.g. pediatricians and family physicians) (Demaria et al., 2013). In Canada, physicians often learn from senior colleagues on the job, who invariably also learn the procedure from other colleagues without a structured circumcision-specific training.  As with all urological procedures, newborn circumcision carries risks that include bleeding (1.5-6.5%), adhesions (9.4%), meatal stenosis (2-10%), and rare but devastating potentially preventable complications such as glans and/or penile shaft amputation, necrotizing fasciitis, and death (Salle et al., 2013). 

Data from the Hospital for Sick Children validated the problem of preventable serious complications that have resulted from non-surgical medical consultants performing the neonatal circumcision procedure. For example, 15 patients were admitted with bleeding post-circumcision to the emergency department from 2019-2020, of which 2 patients had penis injuries that required penile amputations. This data validated a potential knowledge and skill gap among the physicians who perform circumcisions with no formal training. As a result, the Urology Department in collaboration with the Simulation Team at SickKids developed and implemented a Circumcision (Training) Using Simulation (CIRCUS) pilot program in February 2021.

The CIRCUS pilot was a 2-day workshop that provided a comprehensive simulation-based training and education related to the neonatal circumcision procedure. The workshop involved multiple phases of training and evaluation that facilitated skills development for 7 Residents and a Nurse Practitioner. The CIRCUS followed an International Network for Simulation-based Paediatric Innovation, Research, and Education (INSPIRE) Procedure Training Framework, which includes six phases: (a) LEARN: preparation; (b) SEE: demonstration from an expert; (c) PRACTICE: simulation-based training with simulator; (d) PROVE: summative assessment on a simulator; (e) DO: clinical performance; and (f) MAINTAIN: assessment of knowledge retention and promotion of continued training/performance (Marc et al., 2014). The INSPIRE framework was used to improve participants’ knowledge, skills, and confidence in performing newborn circumcisions safely. 

My overall learning goal was to increase my leadership skills, as a Simulation Educator, through leading the development of a customized Simulation Based Education (SBE) curriculum on neonatal circumcision. The SBE curriculum was designed to address the knowledge and skill gaps within interprofessional teams that can contribute to preventable harm within neonatal patients. Completing this fellowship, as a result, has increased my knowledge and awareness of current evidence-based practices, which use SBE to improve paediatric patient safety outcomes. In addition, I have increased my knowledge about the theories, content, and processes that facilitate the use of simulation to support teaching and learning among interprofessional team members at SickKids. For example, I have developed simulation scenarios, operated simulators (e.g. SimPad/ High Fidelity mannequins), and incorporated SBE to assess, teach, debrief, and evaluate interprofessional learners. Lastly, I have gained the essential project management skills imperative to keep all aspects of the CIRCUS pilot project organized, which included initiation, planning, execution, and management of all project deliverables in a timely manner.

Outcomes

To adapt to COVID restrictions, the CIRCUS pilot program restricted enrollment to 8 paediatric trainees, which included 7 residents and 1 nurse practitioner. In addition, training was provided both in-person and virtually. The outcome measures for the program included: (1) pre and post knowledge score of the trainees; (2) pre and post confidence scores of the trainees; (3) objective skills assessments of trainees performing circumcision on simulators (e.g. 3D printed silicone model); and (4) objective skills assessments of trainees’ clinical performances of circumcisions under expert supervision. While the in-depth data analysis for the all the outcome measures is pending, the preliminary results of the pilot showed an average knowledge test scores whereby the pre was approximately 75% and post 91%. All trainees were able to perform > 75% of the procedure independently on a simulator. In addition, 3 trainees who completed their clinical assessments performed >75% of the procedure on paediatric patients independently. Since the pilot shows face validity for both in-person and virtual training components, the plan is to extend  the strategy of using simulation-based education, both in-person and virtual, to promote the provision of neonatal circumcision among external partners locally, nationally, and internationally.

Overall experience

There have been no past initiatives that focused on addressing the knowledge gap of novice and intermediate providers of circumcision through Simulation Based Education (SBE) at SickKids. As a result, the fellowship provided protected time and enabled me to explore the best strategies to improve neonatal circumcision. The fellowship also provided me with an opportunity to collaborate with many educational professionals and subject matter experts to learn and lead in a novel way. There were many challenges along the way and each experience resulted in growth that exceeded my expectations. As a result, I am grateful to have had the opportunity to lead the CIRCUS project through the RNAO fellowship.

 

References

Demaria, J., Abdulla, A., Pemberton, J., Raees, A., & Braga, L. H. (2013). Are physicians performing neonatal circumcisions well-trained? Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada7(7-8), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.200

Kim, J. K., Koyle, M. A., Chua, M. E., Ming, J. M., Lee, M. J., Kesavan, A., Saunders, M., & Dos Santos, J. (2019). Assessment of risk factors for surgical complications in neonatal circumcision clinic. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada13(4), E108–E112. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5460

Marc, A., Todd, C., Daniel, F., Marjorie, W., Renuka, M., James, G., et al. (2014). A comprehensive infant lumber puncture novice procedural skills training package: An INSPIRE simulation-based procedural skills training package. MedEdPORTAL, 10 doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9724

Salle, J. L., Jesus, L. E., Lorenzo, A. J., Romão, R. L., Figueroa, V. H., Bägli, D. J., Reda, E., Koyle, M. A., & Farhat, W. A. (2013). Glans amputation during routine neonatal circumcision: mechanism of injury and strategy for prevention. Journal of pediatric urology9(6 Pt A), 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.09.012