Action Alert: Tell Prime Minister Stephen Harper and MPs that Full Public Debate is Needed Before Signing Deal that Puts Health Care at Risk

Action Alert

Please send an email TODAY to Prime Minister Harper and MPs from all Parties to demand full debate on the Canada-China investment agreement that will put health care, social programs, environmental protection and labour standards seriously at risk.

Background

The Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) is one of a number of investment treaties Canada has signed with a variety of countries. The far-reaching agreement was signed September 8, 2012 though the contents were not revealed until the agreement was tabled in the House of Commons on September 26. The Government admits it intends to ratify the deal without introducing any enabling legislation. RNAO is joining groups and individuals across the country in asking for transparent public discussion and debate of the contents of the Canada-China deal so that all Canadians understand its potential for undermining public policy. Trade and investment agreements are powerful tools that can transform society. We need deals that enhance public services such as health care, not degrade them. The problem is these agreements confer massive power on businesses to negate the public policy, which is part of our democratic process. They do this by giving foreign investors the power to sue for supposedly foregone profits by claiming that democratically-supported public policy adversely affects corporate bottom lines. The damages sought can deter government action to protect the public. RNAO has always asked for transparent trade and investment negotiations with full public consultations and strong protections for domestic environmental, social, health and labour policy. RNAO also urges using those agreements to maintain high standards for those very same areas. There has been considerable legitimate public concern about the China deal for a number of reasons:

Our publicly-funded, not-for-profit health-care system is at risk. Protections in the agreement for environment and health are weak and qualified. There are no protections in the agreement for social programs or labour standards.
China is a very large player and could soon become a major investor in environmentally damaging activities like the Tar Sands.
First Nations are concerned because these FIPAs do not protect their treaty rights, and the risks are very real in the case of investment in oil exploration, tar sands that contaminate rivers and land, and pipelines. More generally, the constitutionality of ratifying without legislation deals like the Canada-China FIPA has been challenged.
Claims against Canadian governments will be heard not by Canadian courts, but by international tribunal arbitrators who are not judges and who meet behind closed doors. The only parties with standing at the tribunals will be the investors and the federal government that is being sued.
Investors are not averse to aggressive use of investor protection mechanisms. One Chinese state-owned enterprise has already used the investment dispute settlement mechanism to sue Belgium for $3 billion it says it lost during the 2008 financial crisis due to an emergency bank nationalization. As law professor and international investment treaty expert Gus Van Harten says, “there is a real possibility that, over the lifespan of the treaty, Canada will face billion dollar-plus awards due to provincial decisions that are not reviewable in Canadian courts.”
All future governments will be tied to the agreement for a minimum of 15 years, with investments made prior to termination covered for an additional 15 years. Including termination notice, this is a 31-year commitment.
Canadian investors will have more incentive to exploit the already abysmally low environmental and labour standards in China.

Canadians need to speak out now! Please use the enclosed Action Alert letter to tell the Prime Minister and MPs that THE CANADA-CHINA INVESTMENT AGREEMENT MUST BE REJECTED until we have an open and transparent process and FULL CONSULTATION with provinces, territories, First Nation communities and Canadians across the country. Too much is at stake.

Your Details

Please enter your personal details.

Your Name: *

Please enter your full name.

Your E-mail: *

Please enter your email address.

Please enter your professional title.

E-mail Subject: *

Subject for email.

E-mail Body: *

The body of the email to be sent.

Submit button is at the bottom of the page.

Resources

Mercer, Rick. (2012). Rick's Rant – China Trade Agreement. Rick Mercer Report. November 6, 2012. Retrieved Nov. 9, 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTIOMJT5ubg&feature=youtu.be [1]
Martin, Lawrence. (2012). Why aren't we debating the Canada-China investment pact? Globe and Mail. October 23.from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/why-arent-we-debating-the-canada-china-investment-pact/article4629358/ [2]
Van Harten, Gus. (2012). What if the Canada-China investment treaty is unconstitutional? Globe and Mail. October 23. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/what-if-the-canada-china-investment-treaty-is-unconstitutional/article4629972/ [3].
Van Harten, Gus. (2012). China Investment Treaty: Expert Sounds Alarms in Letter to Harper. The Tyee. October 16. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from.

Wells, Paul. (2012). Canada-China investment: Big risk in the fine print. September 27, 2012. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/27/canada-china-investment-big-risk-in-the-fine-print/ [4].
West Coast Environmental Law. (2012). Is Canada-China Investment Treaty (FIPA) an attack on Aboriginal Rights? October 31. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert/canada-china-investment-treaty-fipa-attack-aboriginal-rights [5].
West Coast Environmental Law (2012). Letter to Office of Director General, International Legal Programs Section, Re: Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement. November 1. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://wcel.org/sites/default/files/Urgent%20Request%20re%20Canada%20China%20Investment%20Treaty_WCELA.pdf [6]
Francis, Diane. (2012). Canada-China trade deal is too one-sided. Financial Post. November 2. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/11/02/canada-china-trade-deal-is-too-one-sided/ [7]
May, Elizabeth. (2012). Warning to PM Harper from Green Leader About Canada-China Investment Treaty Ratification Deadline. November 2. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://elizabethmaymp.ca/news/publications/press-releases/2012/11/02/warning-to-pm-harper-from-green-leader-about-canada-china-investment-treaty-ratification-deadline/ [8]
Neligan, Myles. (2012). China insurer Ping An files claim for Fortis loss. Reuters. September 24. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/24/pingan-fortis-idINL5E8KO9V520120924 [9]
Trew, Stuart. (2012). Constitutionality of Canada-China investment treaty questioned in First Nations Letters to PM, Chinese government. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://canadians.org/blog/?p=17689 [10]
Van Harten, Gus, and Linnitt, Carol. (2012). China Investment Treaty "a Straitjacket" for Canada: Exclusive Interview with Trade Investment Expert Gus Van Harten. October 17, 18 and 19. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/10/15/china-canada-investment-treaty-designed-be-straight-jacket-canada-exclusive-interview-trade-investment-lawyer-gus-van [11], http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/10/16/china-canada-investment-straitjacket-interview-gus-van-harten-part-2 [12], and http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/10/18/china-canada-investment-straitjacket-interview-gus-van-harten-part-3 [13]
Coyne, Andrew. (2012). Take a closer look at Canada's investment deal with China: It's hard to square the real text with the scary Internet version. Edmonton Journal.. November 6. Retrieved November 6 2012 from http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Take+closer+look+Canada+investment+deal+with+China/7503541/story.html [14]
Harper, Stephen. (2012). PM announces signing of new investment agreement with China. September 8. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category =1&featureId=6&pageId=26&id=5018 [15].
Government of Canada and Government of the People's Republic of China. (2012). Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the People's Republic of China for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/fipa-apie/china-text-chine.aspx?lang=eng&view=d [16]

Campaigns

References

The document was announced September 8 (Harper, Stephen. (2012). PM announces signing of new investment agreement with China. September 8. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www.pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category =1&featureId=6&pageId=26&id=5018 [15].) but dated September 9 (Government of Canada and Government of the People's Republic of China. (2012). Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the People's Republic of China for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/fipa-apie/china-text-chine.aspx?lang=eng&view=d.).
Wells, Paul. (2012). Canada-China investment: Big risk in the fine print. September 27, 2012. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/27/canada-china-investment-big-risk-in-the-fine-print/ [20].
West Coast Environmental Law. (2012). Is Canada-China Investment Treaty (FIPA) an attack on Aboriginal Rights? October 31. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://www.wcel.org/resources/environmental-law-alert/canada-china-investment-treaty-fipa-attack-aboriginal-rights [5].
Trew, Stuart. (2012). Constitutionality of Canada-China investment treaty questioned in First Nations Letters to PM, Chinese government. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://canadians.org/blog/?p=17689 [10].
Van Harten, Gus. (2012). What if the Canada-China investment treaty is unconstitutional? Globe and Mail. October 23. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/what-if-the-canada-china-investment-treaty-is-unconstitutional/article4629972/ [3].
Neligan, Myles. (2012). China insurer Ping An files claim for Fortis loss. Reuters. September 24. Retrieved November 6, 2012 from http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/24/pingan-fortis-idINL5E8KO9V520120924 [9].
Van Harten, Gus. (2012). China Investment Treaty: Expert Sounds Alarms in Letter to Harper. The Tyee. October 16. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2012/10/16/China-Investment-Treaty/ [21].

Action Alert: Tell Prime Minister Stephen Harper and MPs that Full Public Debate is Needed Before Signing Deal that Puts Health Care at Risk

Background

Resources

Campaigns

References

Latest jobs Show all